Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIMS: Little is known about the influence of psychological factors on prognosis in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. We examined the influence of the distressed personality (Type D) and pre-implantation device concerns on short-term mortality in ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutively implanted ICD patients (N = 371; 79.5% men) completed the Type D Scale and the ICD Patient Concerns questionnaire prior to implantation and were followed up for short-term mortality. The prevalence of Type D was 22.4%, whereas 34.2% had high levels of ICD concerns. The incidence of mortality was higher in Type D vs. non-Type D patients 13.3% vs. 4.92%; hazard ratio (HR): 2.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-6.03 and in patients with high vs. low levels of ICD concerns (11.0% vs. 4.5%; HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.08-5.23). Type D personality (HR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.25-6.21) and high levels of ICD concerns (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.06-5.34) remained independent predictors of mortality in separate analyses, adjusting for sex, age, ICD indication, coronary artery disease, and shocks. Patients with clustering of both Type D personality and high levels of pre-implantation concerns (HR: 3.86; 95% CI: 1.64-9.10) had a poorer survival compared with patients with one or none of these risk markers in adjusted analysis. Shocks during the follow-up period were also associated with mortality (HR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.36-7.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with a distressed personality and high levels of pre-implantation device-related concerns had a poorer prognosis, independent of other risk markers including shocks. This subgroup of patients should be identified in clinical practice and would likely benefit from a combined distress management programme and cardiac rehabilitation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Susanne S. Pedersen
Electrophysiology
Krista C. van den Broek
GGz Breburg
Rudolph A. M. Erdman
Erasmus MC
EP Europace
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tilburg University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pedersen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ff52bc1b320180d0db0b3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq296
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: