Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper seeks to contribute to the growing interest in naming men as men as part of a critical analysis of gendered power relations in organizations. The paper highlights the way in which men and masculinities are frequently central to organizational analysis, yet rarely the focus of interrogation. They remain taken for granted and hidden. Examining recent studies that contribute to a critical analysis of gendered power relations, we consider the growing interest in multiplicity, diversity and difference. In particular, we explore the issue of ‘multiple masculinities’ as well as some of the conceptual difficulties that surround it. Arguing for an approach which addresses the unities, differences and interrelations between men and masculinities, we suggest that critical studies of gendered power need to examine the management of organizations in much more detail. Highlighting five masculinities that seem to be routinely embedded in managerial discourses and practices, we conclude by advocating further research in this previously neglected area.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Collinson
Lancaster University
Jeff Hearn
University of Huddersfield
Gender Work and Organization
University of Warwick
University of Bradford
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Collinson et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d78d1a6cc86f5f11b8a404 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x