Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The most pervasively voiced criticism of advance organizers is that their definition and construction are vague and, therefore, that different researchers have varying concepts of what an organizer is and can only rely on intuition in constructing one-since nowhere, claim the critics, is it specified what their criteria are and how they can be constructed (Barnes, B. R. Hartley for this always depends on the nature of the learning material, the age of the learner, and his degree of prior familiarity with the learning passage. From the exhaustive and explicit general discussion of the definition, nature, and effects of an organizer in various publications (Ausubel, 1960; Ausubel Ausubel Fitzgerald & Ausubel, 1963), plus the description of how to construct an
David P. Ausubel (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: