PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 9, 2003BMJ44 citationsOpen Access

Drug treatment of hypertension

BWBryan Williams

Structured PICO

Does the choice of first line treatment for hypertension influence cardiovascular outcome?

P
Population
Patients with hypertension
I
Intervention
Newer antihypertensive drugs (ACE inhibitors or calcium channel blockers)
C
Comparator
Older antihypertensive drugs (thiazides or beta blockers)
O
Outcome
Combined incidence of fatal coronary heart disease and non-fatal myocardial infarctioncomposite

The ALLHAT trial provides adequately powered evidence to determine if the choice of first-line antihypertensive drug influences cause-specific cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most important preventable causes of premature death worldwide,1 and the benefits of antihypertensive drugs have been confirmed by the largest evidence base from clinical trials in medicine. Many classes of drugs are available for treatment, and debate has raged about whether the benefits of treatment are purely a function of the quality of blood pressure control or whether the type of drug used might also be a powerful determinant of outcome. This is a key question because the difference in cost between “older” drugs (thiazides or β blockers) and “newer” drugs (such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers) is substantial. A meta-analysis of trials of treatment for hypertension with the newer drugs found that ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers were likely to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by the same order of magnitude as β blockers or thiazides,2 but such analyses have insufficient statistical power to detect cause specific outcomes with regard to specific drugs. Recently, the “antihypertensive and lipid lowering to prevent heart attack trial” (ALLHAT)—the largest ever randomised trial of antihypertensive treatment—reported its results.3 It was designed to determine whether the choice of first line treatment for hypertension influenced cardiovascular outcome. Importantly, the trial was sufficiently large to examine cause specific outcomes and was the first hypertension study to have sufficient power to examine the combined incidence of fatal coronary heart disease and non-fatal myocardial infarction as the primary end point. ALLHAT was a randomised double blind controlled clinical trial conducted in 623 centres in North America. …

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bryan Williams (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73c11946cd4472af69ef8fhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7380.61
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Calcium-Channel Blockers for Hypertension — Uncertainty Continues1998 · 86 citations
  2. 2British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary1999 · 375 citations
  3. 3Effects of an Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor, Ramipril, on Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Patients2000 · 8,690 citations
  4. 4Original Papers. Success and Predictors of Blood Pressure Control in Diverse North American Settings: The Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)2002 · 986 citations
  5. 5Use of ramipril in preventing stroke: double blind randomised trial2002 · 420 citations