A self-efficacy coaching intervention did not significantly improve exercise self-efficacy, barriers self-efficacy, or independent exercise minutes compared to attention control (p > .10).
RCT (n=65)
Does a self-efficacy coaching intervention improve exercise self-efficacy, barriers self-efficacy, and minutes of independent exercise in cardiac rehabilitation participants?
A self-efficacy coaching intervention did not significantly improve exercise self-efficacy or independent exercise minutes compared to an attention control in cardiac rehabilitation participants.
p-value: p=>.10
Adherence to independent exercise is an essential outcome of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), yet limited theory-based interventions to improve adherence exist. This study tested the effects of an intervention based on Bandura's conceptualization of self-efficacy. The self-efficacy coaching intervention (SCI), a supplement to standard care, was designed to increase self-efficacy for independent exercise and independent exercise behavior in CR. We examined whether the SCI vs. attention control (AC) resulted in improved exercise self-efficacy (ESE), barriers self-efficacy (BARSE), and minutes of independent exercise for CR participants (n = 65). While between-group differences did not reach significance (p > .10) for any of the outcome measures, significant within-group changes were noted in BARSE scores and independent exercise (p < .001) for the SCI group. Change in independent exercise for the AC group was also significant (p =. 006). Further study is needed to explore whether short-term changes translate into maintenance of independent exercise participation after program completion.
Barkley et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=65). Self-efficacy coaching intervention (SCI) vs. Attention control (AC) was evaluated on Exercise self-efficacy (ESE), barriers self-efficacy (BARSE), and minutes of independent exercise (p=>.10). A self-efficacy coaching intervention did not significantly improve exercise self-efficacy, barriers self-efficacy, or independent exercise minutes compared to attention control (p > .10).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: