Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigated how automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions contribute to the impressions formed of targets whose photos varied by race, gender, and occupation. In earlier sessions, participants completed Dunton and Fazio’s (1997) Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions scale, and underwent a priming procedure (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, Williams, 1995) that provided an unobtrusive estimate of their au-tomatically activated racial attitudes. In the final session, participants provided trait ratings of a number of target photos. Automatically activated racial attitudes were related to the trait infer-ences participants made of Blacks compared to matched Whites. However, this effect was mod-erated by motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Among the more motivated, both those with more negative and those with more positive attitudes displayed evidence of correction for their attitudes. This discussion focuses on the ways in which different kinds of motivation to control prejudiced reactions may manifest differently. First impressionsareoftenformedasafunctionof thecategory of which the social target is a member. The general lesson from research in impression formation is that categorical-based im-pressions are relatively effortless and occur under conditions of low motivation or ability, and individuation is effortful and occurs under conditions of high motivation or ability (Brewer,
Olson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: