Over 24 months, cardiac rehabilitation patients fell into inactive (16%), non-maintainer (67%), and maintainer (17%) exercise patterns, with high motivation predicting the maintainer group.
Observational (n=251)
What are the differential patterns of exercise and motivation in cardiac rehabilitation patients over a 24-month period?
High barrier self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-determined motivation are associated with long-term exercise maintenance in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored exercise and motivational patterns of cardiac rehabilitation patients in the long term. PURPOSE: We explored differential patterns of exercise and motivation in cardiac rehabilitation patients over a 24-month period and examined the relationship between these emerging patterns. METHODS: Participants (n = 251) completed an exercise, barrier self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-determined motivation questionnaire. Latent class growth modelling was used to classify patients in different exercise and motivational patterns. RESULTS: Three exercise patterns emerged: inactive, non-maintainers and maintainers (16%, 67% and 17% of sample per pattern, respectively). Multiple trajectories were found for barrier self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-determined motivation (3, 5, and 4, respectively). Patients in high barrier self-efficacy, outcome expectation and self-determined groups had greater probability of being in the maintainer exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying a patient's exercise and motivational profile could help cardiac rehabilitation programmes tailor their intervention to optimize the potential for continued exercise activity.
Sweet et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=251). High barrier self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-determined motivation vs. Lower motivation and self-efficacy groups was evaluated on Exercise patterns (inactive, non-maintainers, maintainers). Over 24 months, cardiac rehabilitation patients fell into inactive (16%), non-maintainer (67%), and maintainer (17%) exercise patterns, with high motivation predicting the maintainer group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: