Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels

The first three formants, i.e., the first three spectral prominences of the short-time magnitude spectra, have been the most commonly used acoustic cues for vowels ever since the work of Peterson and Barney J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175-184 (1952). However, spectral shape features, which encode the global smoothed spectrum, provide a more complete spectral description, and therefore might be even better acoustic correlates for vowels. In this study automatic vowel classification experiments were used to compare formants and spectral-shape features for monopthongal vowels spoken in the context of isolated CVC words, under a variety of conditions. The roles of static and time-varying information for vowel discrimination were also compared. Spectral shape was encoded using the coefficients in a cosine expansion of the nonlinearly scaled magnitude spectrum. Under almost all conditions investigated, in the absence of fundamental frequency (F0) information, automatic vowel classification based on spectral-shape features was superior to that based on formants. If F0 was used as an additional feature, vowel classification based on spectral shape features was still superior to that based on formants, but the differences between the two feature sets were reduced. It was also found that the error pattern of perceptual confusions was more closely correlated with errors in automatic classification obtained from spectral-shape features than with classification errors from formants. Therefore it is concluded that spectral-shape features are a more complete set of acoustic correlates for vowel identity than are formants. In comparing static and time-varying features, static features were the most important for vowel discrimination, but feature trajectories were valuable secondary sources of information.