Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Evidence can be marshalled to support either the view that pollution abatement is a cost burden on firms and is detrimental to competitiveness, or that reducing emissions increases efficiency and saves money, giving firms a cost advantage. In an effort to resolve this seeming paradox, the relationship between emissions reduction and firm performance is examined empirically for a sample of S&P 500 firms using data drawn from the Investor Responsibility Research Center's Corporate Environmental Profile and Compustat. The results indicate that efforts to prevent pollution and reduce emissions drop to the ‘bottom line’ within one to two years of initiation and that those firms with the highest emission levels stand the most to gain.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stuart L. Hart
Gautam Ahuja
Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Michigan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hart et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd2cac7808b00a4799b587 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30::aid-bse38>3.0.co;2-q