Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the investigation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We recently reported on the development and preliminary validation of the IBS-QOL, a specific quality-of-life measure for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to determine the longitudinal construct validity (responsiveness) of the IBS-QOL. METHODS: Female patients enrolled in a multicenter treatment trial for functional bowel disorders were studied pre- and posttreatment with the IBS-QOL and other health status measures. Based on the response to treatment for several variables (pain/14-day score, daily function, and days in bed/3 months), patients were stratified into Responders, Partial Responders, and Nonresponders. Change scores in the IBS-QOL were then statistically compared with changes in the other variables to determine their correlation and whether Responders were significantly different from non- and Partial Responders on the IBS-QOL. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between change scores on the IBS-QOL and the other measures of treatment effect (Pain/14 days, r = 0.25, p < 0.002; Sickness Impact Profile SIP Total Score, r = 0.28, p < 0.0004). In addition, the IBS-QOL scores significantly differentiated Responders from Nonresponders for most of the variables tested (regression trend test for Pain/14 days, p < 0.04; SIP Total, p < 0.0001; SIP Physical, p < 0.0001; SIP Psychosocial, p < 0.002, and SIP Eating, p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The IBS-QOL is responsive to treatment in a referral-based clinical population of patients with functional bowel disorders.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Douglas A. Drossman
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Donald L. Patrick
Northwestern University
William E. Whitehead
Baylor College of Medicine
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
University of Washington
University of Toronto
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Drossman et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01454db124fe58198651e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01941.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: