Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This review offers a critical evaluation of the remarkable progress in antihypertensive therapy since its inception. Despite the introduction of newer, more sophisticated drugs, treatment results have remained stable. Problems impeding further improvement include limited patient compliance, clinical inertia, incomplete adherence to guidelines, and dependence on brachial artery cuff pressures for diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment response. Brachial artery systolic and pulse pressures do not reliably represent aortic or carotid artery pressures, which are better risk predictors for the heart and brain. Mean pressure, which is the same throughout the arterial tree, is directly measurable by cuff oscillometry, and might become the best single risk predictor. Available drugs have limited ability to decrease the aortic stiffness that is responsible for the elevated systolic blood pressure of aging. Therefore, to improve risk assessment and therapeutic benefit, we might include mean blood pressure and pulse pressure into blood pressure measurements, pursue efforts to measure central blood pressure, and search for new drugs to reduce arterial stiffness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michel E. Safar
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Harold Smulyan
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Hôtel-Dieu de Paris
Upstate University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Safar et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a8406739ab56a908595f4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05351.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: