The ACE DD genotype was significantly more frequent in patients with coronary artery spasm compared to those with fixed organic stenosis without spasm (26.2% vs 2.7%, P=0.002).
Case-Control (n=150)
No
Is the ACE gene DD genotype associated with an increased risk of coronary artery spasm in older Japanese males?
The ACE gene DD genotype is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery spasm in older Japanese men, suggesting a potential mechanism for its link to myocardial infarction.
Odds Ratio: 15.6
Absolute Event Rate: 26.2% vs 2.7%
p-value: p=0.002
It has been reported that individuals with the D allele of an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene are at greater risk for myocardial infarction (MI), especially among subjects normally considered to be at low risk. However, little is known about the mechanism by which the ACE polymorphism affects the risk of MI. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is considered to be one possible mechanism for developing MI. We therefore examined the ACE polymorphism relation to CAS to determine if this was the mechanism by which the DD genotype influences MI. We studied 150 angiographically assessed Japanese males, all more than 60 yr old. CASs were detected using intracoronary injection of ergonovine maleate. Subjects were divided into three groups: those with CAS (group 1), those without CAS, but with fixed organic stenosis (group 2); and those without CAS and no organic stenosis (group 3). DD subjects were significantly represented in group 1 when compared with groups 2 (P = 0.002) and 3 (P = 0.026). These results suggest that the DD genotype relates to the greater risk for MI in the patients with CAS.
Oike et al. (Fri,) conducted a case-control in Coronary Artery Spasm (n=150). ACE DD genotype vs. ACE ID or II genotype was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery spasm (CAS) (OR 15.6, p=0.002). The ACE DD genotype was significantly more frequent in patients with coronary artery spasm compared to those with fixed organic stenosis without spasm (26.2% vs 2.7%, P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: