Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article examined evidence for dimensional and typological models of dissociation.The authors reviewed previous research with the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DBS; E. B. Bernstein-Carlson & F. W. Putnam, 1986) and note that this scale, like other dissociation questionnaires, was developed to measure that socalled dissociative continuum.Next, recently developed taxometric methods for distinguishing typological from dimensional constructs are described and applied to DBS item-response data from 228 adults with diagnosed multiple personality disorder and 228 normal controls.The taxometric findings empirically justify the distinction between two types of dissociative experiences.Nonpathological dissociative experiences are manifestations of a dissociative trait, whereas pathological dissociative experiences are manifestations of a latent class variable.The taxometric findings also indicate that there are two types of dissociators.Individuals in the pathological dissociative class (taxon) can be identified with a brief, 8-item questionnaire called the DES-T.Scores on the DES-T and DBS are compared in 11 clinical and nonclinical samples.It is concluded that the DES-T is a sensitive measure of pathological dissociation, and the implications of these taxometric results for the identification, treatment, and understanding of multiple personality disorder and allied pathological dissociative states are discussed.In his original formulation of the construct, Pierre Janet (1889) viewed clinical dissociation as a discontinuity in awareness that is rarely experienced by healthy individuals (Perry & Laurence, 1984).
Waller et al. (Sun,) studied this question.