Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence that short-term ozone exposure is associated with transient decrements in lung functions and increased respiratory symptoms, but the short-term mortality effect of such exposures has not been established. METHODS: We conducted a review and meta-analysis of short-term ozone mortality studies, identified unresolved issues, and conducted an additional time-series analysis for 7 U.S. cities (Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, Philadelphia, and St. Louis). RESULTS: Our review found a combined estimate of 0.39% (95% confidence interval = 0.26-0.51%) per 10-ppb increase in 1-hour daily maximum ozone for the all-age nonaccidental cause/single pollutant model (43 studies). Adjusting for the funnel plot asymmetry resulted in a slightly reduced estimate (0.35%; 0.23-0.47%). In a subset for which particulate matter (PM) data were available (15 studies), the corresponding estimates were 0.40% (0.27-0.53%) for ozone alone and 0.37% (0.20-0.54%) with PM in model. The estimates for warm seasons were generally larger than those for cold seasons. Our additional time-series analysis found that including PM in the model did not substantially reduce the ozone risk estimates. However, the difference in the weather adjustment model could result in a 2-fold difference in risk estimates (eg, 0.24% to 0.49% in multicity combined estimates across alternative weather models for the ozone-only all-year case). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results suggest short-term associations between ozone and daily mortality in the majority of the cities, although the estimates appear to be heterogeneous across cities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kazuhiko Ito
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Samantha F. De Leon
Children's Health Fund
Morton Lippmann
New York University
Epidemiology
New York University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ito et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15ce12d64fa33389a01515 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000165821.90114.7f
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: