Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Primate cones maximally sensitive to short wavelength light (blue cones) have been previously identified by using indirect methods. We stained 7 wholemounted human retinas obtained from 6 female donors, using an affinity purified antibody to a 19 amino acid peptide sequence at the N-terminus of blue opsin (Lerea et al., '89: Neuron 3:367-376), standard PAP immunocytochemistry, and controls. Cones were counted where all outer segments could be traced to inner segments and were measured where cells were well aligned vertically. We find that: (1) 7% of cones within 4 mm of the foveal center are labeled by antiblue opsin; (2) compared to neighboring red/green cones, blue cone inner segments are 10% taller, have a larger cross-sectional diameter near the junction with the outer segment, and a smaller diameter near the external limiting membrane, resulting in a more cylindrical shape, (3) foveal blue cones are sparse, irregularly spaced, and missing in a zone about 100 microns (0.35 degrees) in diameter near the site of peak cone density, (4) the highest densities of blue cones (greater than 2,000 cells/mm2) are found in a ring at 0.1-0.3 mm eccentricity, and (5) the shortest distances between neighboring cones are between blue and red/green cones, and the blue and red/green mosaics are statistically independent. These findings are consistent with psychophysical reports of foveal tritanopia and maximum sensitivity to blue light at 1 degree eccentricity. Blue cone spacing may limit resolution of the blue channel out to 20-30 degrees eccentricity. The blue and red/green mosaics appear to be formed by separate processes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
The Journal of Comparative Neurology
University of Washington
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Curcio et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: