Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Open access (OA) publishing is steadily growing in both full OA journals and hybrid journals where authors can pay to open up individual articles. Funding for article processing charges (APCs) is still a strong barrier for many authors, particularly for subscription journals where the hybrid option is expensive and an added extra feature after an article is accepted for publication. Many research funders in Europe have started or are considering mechanisms for paying APCs with earmarked funding in order to increase the uptake of OA. At the same time they are well aware that their actions may influence the way the OA market will develop in the near future. This article discusses a number of scenarios for ways in which funders could cover the cost of APCs, while encouraging the development of a competitive and transparent market for APC‐funded OA scholarly publishing. We provide evidence that the current APC‐funded full OA market is sensitive to journal prestige/impact. We present a value‐based cap funding scheme which could help maintain transparency, bringing hybrid market pricing in line with the full OA market. We also consider a scenario that addresses hybrid ‘double dipping’ while limiting the cost of transitioning to full OA for research‐intensive universities as well as cost‐sharing as a mechanism for providing authors with an incentive for considering cost as well as value in choosing where to publish.
Björk et al. (Sat,) studied this question.