The Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor showed mean differences of 1.6 mmHg for systolic and 2.1 mmHg for diastolic readings compared to a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Observational (n=85)
Does the Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to direct and indirect measurements in human subjects?
The Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor provides acceptable accuracy for clinical use compared to standard indirect and direct measurements, though it is not suitable for exercise stress testing.
Mean Difference: 1.6
Takeda Medical (A 70 of these yielded usable tracings. The proportion of successful recordings was acceptable, but the device was not suitable for bicycle stress testing. The quality of the accessories provided with the equipment could be improved, but in spite of this the monitoring system was found to be recommendable for clinical use.
Høegholm et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Blood pressure monitoring (n=85). Takeda Medical (A & D) TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor vs. Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Difference in systolic blood pressure readings (MD 1.6 mmHg). The Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor showed mean differences of 1.6 mmHg for systolic and 2.1 mmHg for diastolic readings compared to a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: