The Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor showed mean differences of 1.6 mmHg for systolic and 2.1 mmHg for diastolic readings compared to a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Observational (n=85)
85 subjects aged 13-89 years with a wide range of blood pressures evaluated for ambulatory blood pressure monitor accuracy.
Takeda Medical (A & D) TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor vs Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer
Difference in systolic blood pressure readings — MD 1.6 mmHg
Mean Difference: 1.6
Takeda Medical (A 70 of these yielded usable tracings. The proportion of successful recordings was acceptable, but the device was not suitable for bicycle stress testing. The quality of the accessories provided with the equipment could be improved, but in spite of this the monitoring system was found to be recommendable for clinical use.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Asbjørn Høegholm
Zealand University Hospital
Inge Eidemak
Copenhagen University Hospital
Kjeld Kristensen
Copenhagen University Hospital
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Regional Hospital Central Jutland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Høegholm et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Blood pressure monitoring (n=85). Takeda Medical (A & D) TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor vs. Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Difference in systolic blood pressure readings (MD 1.6 mmHg). The Takeda Medical TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor showed mean differences of 1.6 mmHg for systolic and 2.1 mmHg for diastolic readings compared to a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22ff23a3066e858357ede3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00365519209088357