Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy defined by Cornell voltage-duration product criteria was significantly associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.07) in incident hemodialysis patients.
Observational (n=317)
No
Do ECG voltage-duration product criteria (SP and CP) better predict cardiovascular mortality and correlate with echocardiographic LVH compared to voltage-only criteria in incident hemodialysis patients?
In incident hemodialysis patients, ECG criteria using the product of QRS voltage and duration (SP and CP) are superior to voltage-only criteria for identifying LVH and predicting cardiovascular mortality.
Hazard Ratio: 3.07 (95% CI 1.16–8.11)
p-value: p=0.024
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Electrocardiography (ECG) is the most widely used initial screening test for the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, traditional ECG criteria based only on voltage to detect LVH have limited clinical utility for the detection of LVH because of their poor sensitivity. METHODS: This prospective observational study was undertaken to compare the prognostic significance of commonly used ECG criteria for LVH, namely Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV) or voltage-duration product (SP) and Cornell voltage (CV) or voltage-duration product (CP) criteria, and to investigate the association between echocardiographic LV mass index (LVMI) and ECG-LVH criteria in ESRD patients, who consecutively started maintenance hemodialysis (HD) between January 2006 and December 2008. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients, who underwent both ECG and echocardiography, were included. Compared to SV and CV criteria, SP and CP criteria, respectively, correlated more closely with LVMI. In addition, CP criteria provided the highest positive predictive value for echocardiographic LVH. The 5-year cardiovascular survival rates were significantly lower in patients with ECG-LVH by each criterion. In multivariate analyses, echocardiographic LVH adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 11.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-87.18; P = 0.016 and ECG-LVH by SP (HR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.32-8.92; P = 0.011) and CP (HR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.11; P = 0.024) criteria, but not SV and CV criteria, were significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The product of QRS voltage and duration is helpful in identifying the presence of LVH and predicting cardiovascular mortality in incident HD patients.
Kim et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) on maintenance hemodialysis (n=317). Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) by Cornell voltage-duration product (CP) criteria vs. Absence of ECG-LVH by CP criteria was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.16-8.11, p=0.024). Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy defined by Cornell voltage-duration product criteria was significantly associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.07) in incident hemodialysis patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: