Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Complete (or balanced) repeated measures data arise when all subjects in a study are measured at the same set of time points. Data are often incomplete, because measurements are missed, or the design of the study results in subjects being measured at different sets of time points. This article reviews methods of analysis for incomplete repeated-measures data of this form, from an applied statistician's perspective. Limitations of approaches that (a) ignore between-subject variation, or (b) impute for missing values are discussed. Two methods are advocated that are relatively easy to implement using existing software, namely between-subject analysis of within-subject summary measures, and maximum likelihood based on a model for the data. Methods are applied and compared on four real-data examples with varied analytical objectives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey Gornbein
Cross-Cutting Cardiology
Carlos Gallego Lázaro
University of Southern California
Roderick J. A. Little
University of Michigan
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland
Applied Biomathematics (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gornbein et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2156dfa2a97f3a085af771 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029200100304