Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chinese ways of dealing with seeming contradictions result in a dialectical or compromise approach---retaining basic elements of opposing perspectives by seeking a middle way. European-American ways, on the other hand, deriving from a lay version of Aristotelian logic, result in a differentiation model that polarizes contradictory perspectives in an effort to determine which fact or position is correct. Empirical studies showed that dialectical thinking is a form of folk wisdom in Chinese culture: Chinese preferred dialectical proverbs containing seeming contradictions more than did Americans. Chinese were also found to prefer dialectical resolutions to social conflicts, and to prefer dialectical arguments over classical Western logical arguments. Furthermore, when two apparently contradictory propositions were presented, Americans polarized their views and Chinese were moderately accepting of both propositions. Origins of these cultural differences and their implications for human reasoning in general are discussed. 3 3 Consider the following statements about recent scientific discoveries: Statement A. Two mathematicians have discovered that the activities of a butterfly in Beijing, China, noticeably affect the temperature in the San Francisco Bay Area. Statement B. Two meteorologists have found that the activities of a local butterfly in the San Francisco Bay Area have nothing to do with temperature changes in the same San Francisco Bay Area. What would be your intuitive reaction to these statements? Do you see an implicit contradiction between the two pieces of information? What strategy would you use to deal with such contradictions? What is the rationale for using such a strategy? Does your cultural background affect your reasoning and judgments about contradicti...
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaiping Peng
Richard E. Nisbett
American Psychologist
California Department of Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peng et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d778b8b843b2be9948fec5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.9.741