Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Thinking about and with images has long been central to the practice of geographical fieldwork. This paper considers how the participation of images in urban‐based fieldwork might be understood in the wake of non‐representational theories. Drawing upon our experience of co‐teaching an urban‐based field course in Berlin, we discuss three ways in which such theories allow us to make more of the participation of images in the thinking‐spaces of urban fieldwork. Specifically, we consider how images afford opportunities for attending to everyday ecologies of materials and things; for thinking through the rhythms of urban environments; and for producing affective archives. In concluding we suggest that thinking with images in urban fieldwork can be understood as part of the elaboration of ecologies of non‐representational ethico‐aesthetic practices.
Latham et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: