Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEEditorialNEXTThe Case for Reform of the Undergraduate General Chemistry CurriculumMelanie CooperCite this: J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 3, 231–232Publication Date (Web):February 9, 2010Publication History Published online9 February 2010Published inissue 1 March 2010https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed800096mhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ed800096meditorialACS PublicationsCopyright © 2010 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views6484Altmetric-Citations59LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (545 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Cross-disciplinary concepts,Curriculum,Materials,Students Get e-Alerts
Melanie M. Cooper (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: