Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates if MR-relaxometry of myocardial tissue reveals significant differences in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) compared with patients with systemic amyloidosis but without cardiac involvement (NCA) and a healthy control group. Therefore, we measured T1 and T2 relaxation times (RT) of the left ventricular myocardium with magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients (14 males, 5 females; mean age, 59 +/- 6.1 years) with histologically proven CA were evaluated. T1-RT and T2-RT were measured by using a saturation-recovery TurboFLASH sequence and a HASTE sequence, respectively. Additionally, morphologic and functional data were acquired. Results were compared with patients with systemic amyloidosis but without cardiac involvement (NCA; 5 males, 4 females, 48.9 +/- 15.4 years) and 10 healthy, age-matched control subjects (5 males, 5 females, 60.4 +/- 6.4 years). RESULTS: MR-relaxometry revealed a significant elevation of T1-RT of the left ventricular myocardium in CA-patients compared with that in NCA-patients and the age-matched control group [mean +/- SD (95% CI) 1340 +/- 81 (1303-1376) msec, 1213 +/- 79 (1160-1266) msec, 1146 +/- 71 (1096-1196) msec, respectively; CA vs. control, P or=1273 milliseconds for T1-RT was defined using receiver-operator characteristics-analysis to establish the diagnosis of CA with a high sensitivity (84%) and specificity (>89%). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of T1 and T2 RT is a novel approach for noninvasive evaluation of CA. MR-relaxometry might improve diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of cardiac involvement in systemic amyloidosis.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Waldemar Hosch
Michael Bock
M. Libicher
Investigative Radiology
Heidelberg University
University Hospital Heidelberg
German Cancer Research Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hosch et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f1728950456576348065f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0b013e318059e021
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: