Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this article, the authors discuss “whole‐of‐government” initiatives as a reaction to the negative effects of New Public Management reforms such as structural devolution, “single‐purpose organizations,” and performance management but also as a reaction to a more insecure world. The authors examine what is meant by a “whole‐of‐government” approach and explore how this concept might be interpreted in analytical terms. The structural approach is contrasted with a cultural perspective and a myth‐based perspective. Finally, results, experiences, and lessons from the whole‐of‐government movement are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tom Christensen
University of Oslo
Per Lægreid
University of Bergen
Public Administration Review
University of Oslo
University of Bergen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christensen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69db77afc9a120f055a3bf9f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: