Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are intended to support patients' treatment decisions during a crisis. However, PAD statutes give clinicians broad discretion over whether to carry out patients' advance instructions. This study uses data from a survey of psychiatrists (N=164) to examine reasons for overriding PADs. In response to a hypothetical vignette, 47% of psychiatrists indicated that they would override a valid, competently-executed PAD that refused hospitalization and medication. PAD override was more likely among psychiatrists who worked in hospital emergency departments; those who were concerned about patients' violence risk and lack of insight; and those who were legally defensive. PAD override was less likely among participants who believed that involuntary treatment is largely unnecessary in a high-quality mental health system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey W. Swanson
Duke University
S. Van McCrary
State University of New York
Marvin S. Swartz
Duke University
Law and Human Behavior
Duke University
Duke Medical Center
Stony Brook University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Swanson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2264a5f4540fbb2453cec1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9032-1