Ablative lesion size was optimized by applying 10-20 grams of contact force (98±69 mm3 vs 40±42 mm3 for <10g, P<0.05), whereas mapping required lower force to avoid image distortions.
Cardiac mapping and ablation (n=12)
Moderate to marked contact force (10-20 and ≥20 grams) vs Minimal contact force (<10 grams) (15 watts for 30 seconds)
Ablative lesion volume, p=< 0.05
Absolute Event Rate: 98% vs 40%
p-value: p=< 0.05
INTRODUCTION: While catheter tip/tissue contact has been shown to be an important determinant of ablative lesions in in vitro studies, the impact of contact on the outcomes of mapping and ablation in the intact heart has not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve dogs underwent atrial ablation guided by the Senesitrade mark robotic catheter remote control system. After intracardiac ultrasound (ICE) validation of contact force measured by an in-line mechanical sensor, the relationship between contact force and individual lesion formation was established during irrigated-tipped ablation (flow 17 mL/sec) at 15 watts for 30 seconds. Minimal contact by ICE correlated with force of 4.7 +/- 5.8 grams, consistent contact 9.9 +/- 8.6 grams and tissue tenting produced 25.0 +/- 14.0 grams. Conversely, catheter tip/tissue contact by ICE was predicted by contact force. A contact force of 10-20 and > or =20 grams generated full-thickness, larger volume ablative lesions than that created with <10 grams (98 +/- 69 and 89 +/- 70 mm(3) vs 40 +/- 42 mm(3), P < 0.05). Moderate (10 grams) and marked contact (15-20 grams) application produced 1.5 X greater electroanatomic map volumes that were seen with minimal contact (5 grams) (26 +/- 3 cm(3) vs 33 +/- 6, 39 +/- 3 cm(3), P < 0.05). The electroanatomic map/CT merge process was also more distorted when mapping was generated at moderate to marked contact force. CONCLUSION: This study shows that mapping and ablation using a robotic sheath guidance system are critically dependent on generated force. These findings suggest that ablative lesion size is optimized by the application of 10-20 grams of contact force, although mapping requires lower-force application to avoid image distortions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yasuo Okumura
Electrophysiology
Susan B. Johnson
Georgetown University
T. Jared Bunch
Electrophysiology
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Mayo Clinic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Okumura et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Cardiac mapping and ablation (n=12). Moderate to marked contact force (10-20 and ≥20 grams) vs. Minimal contact force (<10 grams) was evaluated on Ablative lesion volume (p=< 0.05). Ablative lesion size was optimized by applying 10-20 grams of contact force (98±69 mm3 vs 40±42 mm3 for <10g, P<0.05), whereas mapping required lower force to avoid image distortions.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1292e2ea48cb855a351b77 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01135.x