Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Assessment of medical problem-solving by means of paper and pencil tests has proven to be troublesome. Administering a complete paper-patient encounter takes a lot of time, it is difficult to construct a reliable scoring system, and correlations between cases are consistently low. Research into the nature of medical problem-solving suggests that the just brief period of time after confrontation with a problem is critical. Also a test should consist of a considerable number of different cases. Based on these principals a very simple paper and pencil test was developed call Simulation of Initial Medical Problem-solving (SIMP). The test consists of short case-histories followed by the question: 'What would you do as a physician in this situation?'. The open-ended format is chosen to avoid cueing. The answers are scored with score-models constructed by a panel of experts. Administering this instrument takes about 5–10 minutes per case, so in a 2–hour session a test can contain 20–30 cases. The reliability of the scoring and the validity of the instrument have proven to be satisfactory in previous research.
Erik de Graaff (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: