Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system (PNS) component of a first year medical school human anatomy course. METHOD: Existing data from 9 years of instruction involving 856 students were used to determine (1) the effect of web-based interactive instructional techniques on written exam item performance and (2) differences between student opinions of the benefit level of five different types of interactive learning objects used. The interactive learning objects included Patient Case studies, review Games, Simulated Interactive Patients (SIP), Flashcards, and unit Quizzes. RESULTS: Exam item analysis scores were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05) for students receiving the instructional treatment incorporating the web-based interactive learning objects than for students not receiving this treatment. Questionnaires using a five-point Likert scale were analysed to determine student opinion ratings of the interactive learning objects. Students reported favorably on the benefit level of all learning objects. Students rated the benefit level of the Simulated Interactive Patients (SIP) highest, and this rating was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than all other learning objects. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that web-based interactive instructional techniques improve student exam performance. Students indicated a strong acceptance of Simulated Interactive Patient learning objects.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Edwin Allen
West Virginia University
Richard T. Walls
West Virginia University
Frank D. Reilly
West Virginia University
Medical Teacher
West Virginia University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12b11719b8e196073523a6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701753518
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: