A Structuralist Approach to the Economic Trajectories of Russia and the Countries of East-Central Europe since 1900

Abstract I introduce geographical specificity to world-systems concepts of core and periphery to develop a structuralist approach on semiperipheral development in the world-economy. I apply this approach to the historical trajectory of economic growth in Russia and east-central Europe since 1900. I find circumstantial support for Wallerstein's classic assertion that mercantilist semi-withdrawal is a potentially effective development strategy for semiperipheral countries and show that Russia raised its economic output above historical trend levels during the Soviet period. In contrast, east-central Europe fell short of historical trends during the Soviet period, suggesting that Russia's gains may have been made at the expense of its satellite empire. With the end of communism, both Russia and the countries of east-central Europe quickly returned to their long-term historical output levels relative to the core countries of western Europe. Notes 1. I. Wallerstein, The Modern World-System, Vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press 1974). 2. C. Parnreiter, ‘Global Cities, Global Commodity Chains and the Geography of Core-Ness in the Capitalist World-System’, in S. J. Babones and C. Chase-Dunn (eds.), Routledge Handbook of World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Research (Oxford: Routledge 2012) p. 235. 3. A. G. Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (New York: Monthly Review Press 1967). 4. S. Engel-Di Mauro, ‘Seeing the Local in the Global: Political Ecologies World-Systems, and the Question of Scale’, Geoforum 40/1 (2009) p. 121. 5. S. G. Bunker, ‘Matter, Space, Energy, and Political Economy: The Amazon in the World System’, Journal of World-Systems Research 9/2 (2003) pp. 219–258. 6. S. J. Babones, R. M. Farabee-Siers, and F. J. Morales, ‘Dependency Trends in the Globalization Era: Evidence from Export Partner Concentration’, Population Review 50/2 (2011) pp. 134–149. 7. P. J. Taylor and R. J. Johnston, ‘1989 and All That: A Response to Michalak and Gibb’, Area 25/3 (1993) pp. 300–305; M. J. Bradshaw and N. J. Lynn, ’After the Soviet Union: The Post-Soviet States in the World System’, The Professional Geographer 46/4 (1994) pp. 439–449; M. Lavigne, The Economics of Transition: From Socialist Economy to Market Economy (Basingstoke: MacMillanPress 1999). 8. A. Dingsdale, ‘New Geographies of Post-Socialist Europe’, Geographical Journal 165/2 (1999) p. 151. 9. M. Bradshaw, ‘The Post-Socialist States in the World Economy: Transformation Trajectories’, Geopolitics 6/1 (2001) p. 43. 10. W. Z. Michalak and R. A. Gibb, ‘Political Geography and Eastern Europe’, Area 24/4 (1992) pp. 341–349. 11. Bradshaw (note 9). 12. A. Maddison, Statistics on World Population, GDP and per Capita GDP, 1–2008 AD (Groningen: Groningen Growth and Development Centre 2010), available at . 13. Babones, Farabee-Siers, and Morales (note 6). 14. I. M. Wallerstein, ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 16/4 (1974) pp. 387–415. 15. I. M. Wallerstein, ‘Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis’, Theory and Society 3/4 (1976) p. 463. 16. S. J. Babones, ‘Position and Mobility in the Contemporary World-Economy: A Structuralist Perspective’, in S. J. Babones and C. K. Chase-Dunn (eds.), Routledge Handbook of World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Research (Oxford: Routledge 2012) pp. 327–335. 17. A. Szymanski, ‘The Socialist World-System’, in C. K. Chase-Dunn (ed.), Socialist States in the World-System (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications 1982) pp. 57–84. 18. Wallerstein, ‘Rise and Future Demise’ (note 14) p. 413. 19. Ibid., p. 411. 20. Ibid., p. 407. 21. Bradshaw and Lynn (note 7). 22. A. O. Hirschman, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press 1945). 23. League of Nations, International Trade Statistics, 1938 (Geneva: Economic Intelligence Service of the League of Nations 1939). 24. International Monetary Fund (IMF), Direction of Trade Statistics: November 2010 Edition (Washington: IMF 2010). 25. C. P. Terlouw, The Regional Geography of the World-System: External Arena, Periphery, Semiperiphery, Core (Utrecht: KNAG 1992). 26. R. J. Dezzani, ‘Stability Analysis of World Economic Regions’, Journal of Regional Science 42/3 (2002) pp. 595–625; S. J. Babones, ’The Country-Level Income Structure of the World-Economy’, Journal of World-Systems Research 11/1 (2005) pp. 29–55. 27. J. A. Agnew, ‘Sociologizing the Geographical Imagination: Spatial Concepts in the World-System Perspective’, Political Geography Quarterly 1/2 (1982) pp. 159–166. 28. Babones, Farabee-Siers, and Morales (note 6). 29. C. Flint and F. M. Shelley, ‘Structure, Agency, and Context: The Contributions of Geography to World-Systems Analysis’, Sociological Inquiry 66/4 (1996) p. 500. 30. K. Terlouw, ‘Semi-Peripheral Developments: From World-Systems to Regions’, Capitalism Nature Socialism 14/4 (2003) pp. 71–90. 31. G. Arrighi and J. Drangel, ‘The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone’, Review 10/1 (1986) p. 26. 32. M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. by Talcott Parsons (London: Unwin University Books 1930). 33. I. M. Wallerstein, The Capitalist World-Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press 1979) p. 72. 34. Arrighi and Drangel (note 31). 35. See, e.g., I. Iwasaki and T. Suzukia, ‘Transition Strategy, Corporate Exploitation, and State Capture: An Empirical Analysis of the Former Soviet States’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40/4 (2007) pp. 393–422; M. A. Guerrero, ’Broadcasting and Democracy in Mexico: From Corporatist Subordination to State Capture’, Policy and Society 29/1 (2010) pp. 23–35. 36. R. C. Allen, ‘The Rise and Decline of the Soviet Economy’, Canadian Journal of Economics 34/4 (2001) p. 861. 37. S. J. Babones and M. J. Alvarez-Rivadulla, ‘Standardized Income Inequality Data for Use in Cross-National Research’, Sociological Inquiry 77/1 (2007) pp. 3–22. 38. D. Kar and S. Freitas, Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries Over the Decade Ending 2009 (Washington, DC: Center for International Policy 2011). 39. Maddison, Statistics on World Population (note 12). 40. A. Maddison, Monitoring the World Economy 1820–1992 (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1995). 41. A. Maddison, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2001). 42. A. Maddison, The World Economy: Historical Statistics (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2003). 43. G. Federico, ’The World Economy 0–2000 AD: A Review Article’, European Review of Economic History 6/1 (2002) pp. 111–120. 44. R. P. Korzeniewicz, A. Stach, V. Patil, and T. P. Moran, ‘Measuring National Income: A Critical Assessment’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 46/3 (2004) pp. 535–586. 45. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), OECD Economic Outlook 89 (Paris: OECD 2011). 46. International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook: October 2010 Edition (Washington: IMF 2010). 47. G. Ofer, ‘Soviet Economic Growth: 1928–1985’, Journal of Economic Literature 25/4 (1987) pp. 1767–1833. 48. P. Hanson and M. Bradshaw, Regional Economic Change in Russia (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2000); T. F. Remington, The Politics of Inequality in Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011). 49. M. A. Molchanov, ‘Russia and Globalization’, Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 4/3-4 (2005) p. 425. 50. I. T. Berend, ‘What is Central and Eastern Europe?’, European Journal of Social Theory 8/4 (2005) pp. 401–416. 51. P. W. Kuznets, ‘An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 36/3 (1988) pp. 11–43. 52. A. Boltho, ‘Was Japanese Growth Export-Led?‘, Oxford Economic Papers 48/3 (1996) pp. 415–432. 53. A. H. Amsden, ‘Why Isn't the Whole World Experimenting with the East Asian Model to Develop? Review of the East Asian Miracle’, World Development 22/4 (1994) pp. 627–633. 54. L. F. Wasilewski, The Economic Development and Taxation System: A Comparative Study of Brazil and Japan Yokohama, Thesis (Yokohama: Yokohama National University 2000). 55. J. B. Shoven and T. Tachibanaki, ’The Taxation of Income from Capital in Japan’, in J. B. Shoven (ed.), Government Policy towards Industry in the United States and Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988) p. 54. 56. R. C. Hsu, The MIT Encyclopedia of the Japanese Economy, 2nd Edition (Cambridge: MIT Press 1999) pp. 440–441. 57. W. Takahashi, ‘The Japanese Financial Sector's Transition from High Growth to the "Lost Decades"’, in A. Walter and X. Zhang (eds.), East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, Continuity, and Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) p. 204. 58. J. Galtung, ‘A Structural Theory of Imperialism’, Journal of Peace Research 8/2 (1971) pp. 81–117. 59. S. Cohn, Employment and Development under Globalization: State and Economy in Brazil (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2012) Chapter 7. 60. Wallerstein, ‘Rise and Future Demise’ (note 14). 61. W. Robinson and J. Harris, ‘Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class’, Science and Society 64/1 (2000) pp. 11–54; L. Sklair, The Transnational Capitalist Class (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2001).