Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for patients with resected colon cancer who are at high risk for recurrence, but the efficacy and toxicity of such treatment in patients more than 70 years of age are controversial. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis, based on the intention to treat, of individual patient data from seven phase 3 randomized trials (involving 3351 patients) in which the effects of postoperative fluorouracil plus leucovorin (five trials) or fluorouracil plus levamisole (two trials) were compared with the effects of surgery alone in patients with stage II or III colon cancer. The patients were grouped into four age categories of equal size, and analyses were repeated with 10-year age ranges (70 years), with the same conclusions. The toxic effects measured in all trials were nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, and leukopenia. Patients in the fluorouracil-plus-leucovorin and fluorouracil-plus-levamisole groups were combined for the efficacy analysis but kept separate for toxicity analyses. RESULTS: Adjuvant treatment had a significant positive effect on both overall survival and time to tumor recurrence (P70 years), except for leukopenia in one study. CONCLUSIONS: Selected elderly patients with colon cancer can receive the same benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy as their younger counterparts, without a significant increase in toxic effects.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel J. Sargent
University of Siena
Richard M. Goldberg
University of Siena
Stacy D. Jacobson
Mayo Clinic
New England Journal of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Aix-Marseille Université
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sargent et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ac32c49c6765e3885e525 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa010957
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: