Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article proposes a new quantity for assessing the number of groups or clusters in a dataset. The key idea is to view clustering as a supervised classification problem, in which we must also estimate the “true” class labels. The resulting “prediction strength” measure assesses how many groups can be predicted from the data, and how well. In the process, we develop novel notions of bias and variance for unlabeled data. Prediction strength performs well in simulation studies, and we apply it to clusters of breast cancer samples from a DNA microarray study. Finally, some consistency properties of the method are established.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert Tibshirani
Guenther Walther
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Stanford University
Stanford Health Care
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tibshirani et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0da1be88250cfcc2a509bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/106186005x59243