Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Given the number of new cancer cases diagnosed each year and the increases in survival rates, the importance of having a clinically useful health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument has increased. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) is one such instrument that has been used worldwide to assess HRQOL. Previously, the use of the FACT-G had been limited because of a lack of published normative data. Normative data are useful for consumers to place their results in an appropriate context by comparing their scores of individuals or group of individuals to a reference group. Here, we present normative data for the FACT-G for two reference groups: (a) a sample of the general U.S. adult population and (b) a large, heterogeneous sample of adult patients with cancer. In addition, we demonstrate various uses of the normative data.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Penny S. Brucker
Kathleen J. Yost
John Cashy
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Northwestern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brucker et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dabdb837b5141e3ba3c6d5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275341
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: