Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The diagnostic criteria of the third edition of the DSM-III often state that one diagnosis cannot be made if it is "due to" another disorder. Using data from the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, with a sample of 11,519 subjects from a community population, we found that if two disorders were related to each other according to the DSM-III exclusion criteria, then the presence of a dominant disorder greatly increased the odds of having the excluded disorder. We also found that disorders, which DSM-III says are related to each other, were more strongly associated than disorders, which DSM-III says are unrelated. However, we also found there was a general tendency toward co-occurrence, so that the presence of any disorder increased the odds of having almost any other disorder, even if DSM-III does not list it as a related disorder. We concluded that empirical studies are needed to study the assumptions underlying the use of a diagnostic hierarchy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey Boyd
Archives of General Psychiatry
National Institutes of Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey Boyd (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc9f1e34612599f3359310 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790210065008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: