A single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren showed no significant differences in AUC between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (ratio of geometric means 1.12; 90% CI 0.85-1.48).
Observational
Open-label
Nonrandomized
No
Does hepatic impairment affect the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren compared to healthy subjects?
Hepatic impairment has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of aliskiren following single-dose administration, indicating dosage adjustment is unlikely to be needed.
Effect estimate: Ratio of geometric means 1.12 (95% CI 0.85-1.48)
Aliskiren is the first in a new class of orally active, direct renin inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension. This open-label, nonrandomized, single-center, parallel-group study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren in patients with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment to that in healthy subjects. When pooled across subgroups, there were no significant differences between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects in aliskiren AUC(0-infinity) (ratio of geometric means, 1.12; 90% confidence interval, 0.85, 1.48) or Cmax (mean ratio, 1.19; 90% confidence interval, 0.84, 1.68), and there was no correlation between severity of hepatic impairment and either AUC(0-infinity) or Cmax. Aliskiren was well tolerated by healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. In conclusion, hepatic impairment has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of aliskiren following single-dose administration, and dosage adjustment is unlikely to be needed in patients with liver disease.
Vaidyanathan et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Hepatic impairment. Aliskiren vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Aliskiren AUC(0-infinity) (Ratio of geometric means 1.12, 95% CI 0.85-1.48). A single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren showed no significant differences in AUC between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (ratio of geometric means 1.12; 90% CI 0.85-1.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: