Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines on preferred cardiac marker strategies for investigation of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are available from the laboratory medicine and cardiology communities. Therefore, implementation of these guidelines into daily clinical practice should be a joint effort of laboratory specialists and clinicians. This was investigated in this survey. METHODS: A pilot study was performed sponsored by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. A link to an online questionnaire was e-mailed to 990 laboratories from eight European countries in May 2006. The requested information included tests performed, clinical protocol development, and reference limits. RESULTS: We obtained a total of 220 responses. Out of these, 208 responses (95%) were from hospitals that provide 24-h admission of patients. The suggested turn-around-time (88% for cardiac troponin T/I and for CK-MB mass. The majority of the laboratories derive their decision limits from kit inserts provided by the manufacturers. The results revealed a worrying fact that external quality assessments are not used in all testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrated that cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of ACS. Half of the participants had written protocols, mostly as a result of collaboration between laboratorians and clinicians.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kari Pulkki
Cardiac Imaging
Janne Suvisaari
University of Helsinki
Paul Collinson
Preventive Cardiology
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Helsinki University Hospital
Aarhus University Hospital
University of Eastern Finland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pulkki et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09093c2757fd3263d3a8fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2009.044
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: