Home blood pressure increases of 10 mmHg predicted cardiovascular events (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.20) and mortality, remaining a significant prognostic variable over and above office blood pressure.
Meta-Analysis (n=17,698)
Home blood pressure measurement vs Office blood pressure measurement (per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP)
All-cause mortality — HR 1.14 (1.01-1.29)
Effect estimate: HR 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.29)
OBJECTIVE: Examine the relationship between home blood pressure (BP) and risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of home BP. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events. We extracted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) which were pooled with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. RESULTS: We identified eight studies with 17 698 participants. Follow-up was 3.2-10.9 years. For all-cause mortality (n = 747) the hazard ratio for home BP was 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.29) per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP compared to 1.07 (0.91-1.26) for office BP. For cardiovascular mortality (n = 193) the hazard ratio for home BP was 1.29 (1.02-1.64) per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP compared to 1.15 (0.91-1.46) for office BP. For cardiovascular events (n = 699) the hazard ratio for home BP was 1.14 (1.09-1.20) per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP compared to 1.10 (1.06-1.15) for office BP. In three studies which adjusted for office and home BP the hazard ratio was 1.20 (1.11-1.30) per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP for home BP adjusted for office BP compared to 0.99 (0.93-1.07) per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP for office BP adjusted for home BP. Diastolic results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Home BP remained a significant predictor of cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events after adjusting for office BP suggesting it is an important prognostic variable over and above that of office BP.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alison Ward
Grady Health System
Osamu Takahashi
Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
Richard Stevens
Preventive Cardiology
Journal of Hypertension
University of Oxford
Life Science Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ward et al. (Wed,) reported a meta-analysis. Home blood pressure measurement vs. Office blood pressure measurement was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29). Home blood pressure increases of 10 mmHg predicted cardiovascular events (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.20) and mortality, remaining a significant prognostic variable over and above office blood pressure.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a093437071d6da446961233 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32834e4aed