Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Studies on the frequency of the different types of urinary crystals and the role of Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (FTIRM) for identification are few. We describe the results of a retrospective study on the prevalence and typology of crystalluria and on the role of FTIRM. METHODS: Urinary crystals were identified using the combined knowledge of crystal morphology, birefringence features and urine pH (combined approach). When this was inconclusive, FTIRM was performed. RESULTS: Crystalluria was found in 807 out of 9834 samples (8.2%). In 793, the combined approach identified "typical" crystals, while in 14 FTIRM was needed to identify "atypical" crystals. Among "typical crystals", calcium oxalate (75.9%), uric acid (25.9%) and amorphous urates (7.9%), alone or in combination, were the most frequent. Brushite, ammonium biurate and cystine were the most rare (0.1%-0.7%). FTIRM identified 12 of 14 atypical crystals: three crystals were due to a drug (amoxicillin, indinavir, doubtful phenytoloxamine); four were due to calcium oxalate mono- or bihydrate, uric acid bihydrate or struvite; five were due to calcium carbonate, Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein, or rare salt combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Crystalluria is not rare and most crystals can be identified by the combined approach. Occasionally, identification of crystals will require FTIRM.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Simona Verdesca
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Giovanni B. Fogazzi
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Giuseppe Garigali
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Verdesca et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1dba7a6f8771f2e95cd755 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.078