Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The current growth literature has stalled over which measures to use in empirical studies, causing a fragmented theory base. This paper claims that there is a third issue that further curbs efforts in developing a better understanding of business growth. Based on a thorough literature review, a quantitative, and a qualitative study, we find that academic scholars and entrepreneurs do not talk about the same thing when they say “business growth.” For practitioners, growth is a more complex phenomenon—with a strong emphasis on internal development—which differs from the simplified conceptualization of growth used in empirical studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leona Achtenhagen
University of St.Gallen
Lucia Naldi
Hanken School of Economics
Лейф Мелин
Linköping University
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Jönköping University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Achtenhagen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c68dcfa01e990d9f818a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00376.x