Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose This conceptual paper aims to examine theoretical issues in the proactive ethical assessment of technology development, with a focus on uncertainty. Although uncertainty is a fundamental feature of complex technologies, its importance has not yet been fully recognized within the field of ethics. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to study uncertainty in technology development and its consequences for ethics. Design/methodology/approach Going on the insight of various scientific disciplines, the concept of uncertainty will be scrutinised and a typology of uncertainty is proposed and introduced to ethical theory. The method used is theoretical and conceptual analysis. Findings The analysis results in questions with regard to the collection of information about the object of assessment (i.e. complex technologies and their development) and the framework of assessment (i.e. ethical theory and its practical aim of guiding the assessment of technology development). Moreover, based on the insights of the analysis of uncertainty, it is argued that substantive ethical theories prove to be inapt for the ethical assessment of complex technology development and therefore require a concomitant procedural approach. The paper concludes with requirements for any future ethics of technology under uncertainty. Originality/value The value of the paper consists in establishing the need of researching and incorporating uncertainty in ethics. The results are consequently of practical and theoretical interest for anyone working in the field of ethics and technology.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Sollie
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Utrecht University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Sollie (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09084f0465d979db9d151f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960710846155
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: