Radiofrequency catheter ablation of an accessory pathway resulted in clinical recurrence due to a previously unnoticed dormant pathway in only 0.7% of patients.
Cohort (n=1,280)
What is the incidence of clinical recurrences mediated by the late manifestation of conduction over a previously 'dormant' accessory pathway after successful ablation?
Clinical recurrences due to late manifestation of a previously 'dormant' accessory pathway after successful ablation are rare (0.7%) and likely due to intermittent conduction.
INTRODUCTION: Recurrence of clinical symptoms after radiofrequency catheter ablation of an accessory atrioventricular pathway (AP) may be due to the late manifestation of an additional AP that was not detected during the initial ablation session. It was the purpose of this study to elucidate the phenomenon of these "dormant" APs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 1280 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of an AP, 54 patients (4.2%) developed clinical symptoms postablation, necessitating a repeat ablation session. Recurrence of conduction over the AP targeted at the initial ablation session was found in 45 patients, whereas in the other 9 patients (0.7%) the manifestation of a previously unnoticed AP had caused symptom recurrence. Retrospective analysis of the data from these patients' ablation sessions revealed that the late manifesting AP was ablated at a site clearly different from that of the initially targeted AP, and that the manifestation of conduction over a previously "dormant" AP occurred significantly later than the recovery of a presumably ablated AP. Seven (78%) of the 9 "dormant" APs were concealed, and none exhibited decremental conduction properties. CONCLUSION: The incidence of clinical recurrences mediated by the late manifestation of conduction over a previously "dormant" AP is low. The lack of an anatomic vicinity of these predominantly concealed APs with the initially targeted AP and the lack of evidence for their presence during the initial ablation session suggest intermittent conduction as the most likely explanation for their late manifestation.
Schlüter et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Accessory atrioventricular pathway (n=1,280). Radiofrequency catheter ablation was evaluated on Clinical recurrence due to a previously unnoticed dormant accessory pathway. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of an accessory pathway resulted in clinical recurrence due to a previously unnoticed dormant pathway in only 0.7% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: