Does a hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy reduce the need for vasodilator administration compared to an FFR-only strategy in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation?
Hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy
FFR-only strategy
Need for vasodilator administration and classification agreementsurrogate
A hybrid iFR-FFR strategy may facilitate broader adoption of physiology-guided PCI by reducing the need for vasodilators without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
A hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy for revascularisation could increase adoption of physiology-guided PCI, by more than halving the need for vasodilator administration, whilst maintaining high classification agreement with an FFR-only strategy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ricardo Petraco
Interventional Cardiology
Jin Joo Park
Heart Failure & Transplant
Sayan Sen
Interventional Cardiology
EuroIntervention
Imperial College London
Seoul National University
Royal Brompton Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Petraco et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e52df2be91d4a9e2d37b10 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i10a179
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: