Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper analyses the role of rankings as an instrument of new managerialism. It shows how rankings are reconstituting the purpose of universities, the role of academics and the definition of what it is to be a student. The paper opens by examining the forces that have facilitated the emergence of the ranking industry and the ideologies underpinning the so-called ‘global’ university rankings. It demonstrates how rankings are a part of politically inspired, performativity-led mode of governance, designed to ensure that universities are aligned with market values through systems of intensive auditing. It interrogates how the seemingly objective character of rankings, in particular the use of numbers, creates a facade of certainty that make them relatively unassailable: numerical ordering gives the impression that what is of value in education can be measured numerically, hierarchically ordered and incontrovertibly judged. The simplicity and accessibility of numerical rankings deflects attention from their arbitrariness and their political and moral objectives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kathleen Lynch
Allegheny College
Critical Studies in Education
University College Dublin
Social Justice Ireland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kathleen Lynch (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a122121a2d24b27c166b720 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.949811
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: