Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring using the Penaz principle demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.98 compared to intra-arterial measurements during rest, tilt, and recovery.
Observational (n=12)
Healthy volunteers (central hypovolemia model) (n=12)
Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (Penaz principle) vs Intra-arterial catheter system
Correlation of blood pressure and heart rate measurements between methods — Correlation coefficient 0.98
Effect estimate: Correlation coefficient 0.98
Continuous blood pressure measurement by a non-invasive means is of clinical utility in many situations where changes in cardiovascular hemodynamics and blood volume distribution are likely to occur. We have compared blood pressure measurements using the Penaz principle (Finapres, Ohmeda) to an intra-arterial catheter system during head-up tilt (reverse Trendelenburg's position) which models central hypovolemia. Twelve healthy volunteers were raised to a 60 degree head-up tilt position for 60 min or until presyncope occurred. Seven subjects developed presyncopal symptoms at a mean time of 38 +/- 6 min with blood pressure measured by the Penaz principle falling from 140 +/- 8/72 +/- 4 to 82 +/- 10/54 +/- 6 mmHg (18.7 +/- 1.1/9.6 +/- 0.5 to 10.9 +/- 1.3/7.2 +/- 0.8 kPa) (P less than 0.01), at which point they were returned to a horizontal position with an immediate rise in blood pressure. During the maximal drop in blood pressure, heart rate decreased from 82 +/- 7 to 45 +/- 5 (P less than 0.01). Overall, the non-invasive system had a correlation coefficient of 0.98 as compared to the intra-arterial method and ECG for blood pressure and heart rate in all 12 subjects during rest, tilt, and recovery. We conclude that the Penaz principle apparatus is a useful monitor of symptomatic hypotension during central hypovolemia.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
D. B. Friedman
New York University
Frank B. Jensen
University of Southern Denmark
Steen Matzen
Zealand University Hospital
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
University of Copenhagen
Rigshospitalet
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Friedman et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Healthy volunteers (central hypovolemia model) (n=12). Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (Penaz principle) vs. Intra-arterial catheter system was evaluated on Correlation of blood pressure and heart rate measurements between methods (Correlation coefficient 0.98). Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring using the Penaz principle demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.98 compared to intra-arterial measurements during rest, tilt, and recovery.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07b57715d371b388386af9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03137.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: