Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Investigators examined whether use of personal self-monitoring tools representing traditional “athletic training logs” improved training-related measures. Competitive Canadian intercollegiate swimmers (N = 26; M age = 20.4 years; 10 men, 21 women) were assigned training-related goals and then were randomly assigned to either a log group that self-monitored targeted training behaviors (SM-TB), or a self-monitoring comparison group (SMC) for 26 days. Swimmers’ adherence to training prescriptions was analyzed using repeated measures tests. Results showed no group effects or interactions, however, both groups improved adherence during the first 17 days of the intervention (p < .001). Self-report measures were analyzed using pre- and post-tests. The SM-TB group increased their reported intent to assess attendance during the intervention more than the SMC group (p = .07). Post-test, both the SM-TB and SMC groups reported greater intent to assess adherence (p < .01) and punctuality (p = .06), and higher self-regulatory confidence for punctuality (p = .06).
Young et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: