Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: Oxygen consumption (VO2I) and delivery (DO2I) indices have been stated to be superior to conventional parameters as endpoints for resuscitation. However, another interpretation of published data is that inability to increase VO2I/DO2I given adequate volume resuscitation reflects inadequate physiologic reserve and poor outcome. DESIGN: Fifty-eight critically ill patients were randomized to two groups. In group 1 (27 patients) attempts were made to maintain VO2I > or = 150 or DO2I > or = 600 mL/min/m2. If DO2I was > 600, no attempt was made to increase VO2I even if it was or = 600 during the first 24 hours of the study and in 21 of 24 (88%) of those who did not (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the incidence of OF or death in patients resuscitated based on oxygen transport parameters compared to conventional parameters. These data suggest that given adequate volume resuscitation, oxygen-based parameters are more useful as predictors of outcome than as endpoints for resuscitation.
Durham et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: