Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article uses a study of a public housing eviction board over a thirty-year period to illustrate the ambiguities and difficulties that attend longitudinal court docket research. It argues that these problems can never be eliminated but that they may be minimized by strategies that complement quantitative court docket data with qualitative contextual information. Several such strategies are mentioned.
Richard Lempert (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: