Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Multiple organ failure (MOF) is the primary cause of death in surgical intensive care units (SICU). Mortality increases with an increasing number of failed organs, but it has been recognized that lesser degrees of organ dysfunction occur commonly. Such gradations of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) are postulated to provide more descriptive and predictive power. We analyzed and compared two different MODS/MOF scoring systems and determined the utility of gradations of organ dysfunction for prediction of mortality in MODS/MOF. One of the scoring systems defines organ failure as an all-or-nothing phenomenon for each organ, whereas the other scoring system describes increasing organ dysfunction on a 24-point scale. Each scoring system assesses the same six organs. Admission APACHE II (All) and Alll scores were calculated as independent estimates of mortality. In 867 consecutive SICU admissions, 261 patients (30%) had some degree of organ dysfunction, of whom 142 patients (54%) met criteria for single or multiple organ failure. The mean admission All score was 19 (25 for nonsurvivors), and the Alll score was 62 (91 for nonsurvivors). Overall mrotality was 5.8%, but among those patients with organ dysfunction, mortality was 19%. Death was equally likely for comparable degrees of organ dysfunction and failure. Mortality increased (p < 0.01, ANOVA) with higher scores in both systems. In patients with 9–12 organ dysfunction points, the number of failed organs was 1.5 ± 0.2 in 34 survivors, versus 2.9 ± 0.3 in the 14 nonsurvivors (p < 0.001). Correlation (p < 0.001) of organ failure and organ dysfunction scores, as well as increased APACHE scores in tandem with increased MODS/MOF scores, suggests that both scales assess the same events. Use of the graded organ dysfunction score added no benefit for prediction of mortality. As shown by the relationship between the number of failed organs at modest degrees of overall organ dysfunction, mortality from MOF is associated with catastrophic failure of relatively few organs, rather than by more widespread, modest derangements.
Barie et al. (Sat,) studied this question.