Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Distressed and nondistressed couples in two studies made decisions on highland low-conflict tasks. They continuously coded both the intended impact of their own behavior and the impact of their spouse's behavior. In Study 1 distressed couples did not differ from nondistressed couples on how they intended their behavior to be received. However, the behavior of distressed spouses was actually received more negatively by their partners than the behavior of their nondistressed counterparts. The couples in Study 2 also behaved in a way consistent with a communication deficit explanation of distressed marriages; that is, distressed couples' behavior was likely to be coded as more negative than they intended. Task effects and a reciprocity hypothesis were also tested Data from Study 1 showed no conflict effect, but the results of Study 2 suggested that high-conflict tasks may be a better means for discriminating distressed from nondistressed couples than low-conflict tasks. The data on reciprocity indicate only minimal support for the view that distressed marriage is characterized by less positive or more negative reciprocity than nondistressed marriage.
John et al. (Thu,) studied this question.