A multivariate Bayes linear model demonstrated a significantly higher discrimination capacity for predicting postoperative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (AUC 0.80) compared to a fully customized score model (AUC 0.76, p<0.05).
Observational (n=1,090)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.76%
p-value: p=<0.05
INTRODUCTION: Although most risk-stratification scores are derived from preoperative patient variables, there are several intraoperative and postoperative variables that can influence prognosis. Higgins and colleagues previously evaluated the contribution of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative predictors to the outcome. We developed a Bayes linear model to discriminate morbidity risk after coronary artery bypass grafting and compared it with three different score models: the Higgins' original scoring system, derived from the patient's status on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and two models designed and customized to our patient population. METHODS: We analyzed 88 operative risk factors; 1,090 consecutive adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. Training and testing data sets of 740 patients and 350 patients, respectively, were used. A stepwise approach enabled selection of an optimal subset of predictor variables. Model discrimination was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, whereas calibration was measured using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: A set of 12 preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative predictor variables was identified for the Bayes linear model. Bayes and locally customized score models fitted according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. However, the comparison between the areas under the ROC curve proved that the Bayes linear classifier had a significantly higher discrimination capacity than the score models. Calibration and discrimination were both much worse with Higgins' original scoring system. CONCLUSION: Most prediction rules use sequential numerical risk scoring to quantify prognosis and are an advanced form of audit. Score models are very attractive tools because their application in routine clinical practice is simple. If locally customized, they also predict patient morbidity in an acceptable manner. The Bayesian model seems to be a feasible alternative. It has better discrimination and can be tailored more easily to individual institutions.
Biagioli et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=1,090). Bayes linear model vs. Fully customized score model was evaluated on Discrimination capacity for postoperative morbidity (Area under the ROC curve) (95% CI 0.75-0.83, p=<0.05). A multivariate Bayes linear model demonstrated a significantly higher discrimination capacity for predicting postoperative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (AUC 0.80) compared to a fully customized score model (AUC 0.76, p<0.05).