Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: HbA(1c), expressed as the percentage of adult haemoglobin that is glycated, is the most widely used measure of chronic glycaemia. Achieving near-normal HbA(1c) levels has been shown to reduce long-term complications and the HbA(1c) assay is recommended to determine whether treatment is adequate and to guide adjustments. However, daily adjustments of therapy are guided by capillary glucose levels (mmol/l). We determined the relationship between an accurate measure of mean glucose levels over time and the HbA(1c) level, and whether HbA(1c) can be expressed in the same units as self-monitoring results. METHODS: Twenty-two participants with diabetes and three non-diabetic participants were included in this longitudinal observational study. Mean glucose levels were measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which measures interstitial glucose levels every 5 min, for 12 weeks. Capillary measurements were obtained four times per day to confirm the accuracy of CGM. HbA(1c) was measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The HbA(1c) results at weeks 8 and 12 correlated strongly (r = 0.90) with the CGM results during the preceding 8 and 12 weeks. A curvilinear (exponential) relationship and a linear regression captured the relationship with similarly high correlations, which allowed transformation of HbA(1c) values to a calculated mean glucose level. CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATION: HbA(1c) correlates closely with a complete measure of average glycaemia over the preceding 8-12 weeks. The translation of HbA(1c) to an average glucose level for reporting and management purposes is feasible.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David M. Nathan
Massachusetts General Hospital
Heather Turgeon
National Institutes of Health
Susan Regan
Harvard University
Diabetologia
Harvard University
Massachusetts General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nathan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c739ad48675e494237641 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0803-0